An evaluation of the seal capacity and CO2 retention properties of the Eau Claire Formation (Cambrian)

The Eau Claire Formation of the midwestern United States was evaluated for its potential use as a confining unit (seal) overlying a sandstone reservoir to securely store injected CO2. This evaluation included: (1) lithofacies composition and distribution, (2) capillary entry pressure anal... Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Online Access: Get full text
doi: 10.1306/eg.05011414003
Authors:Lahann, R.; Rupp, J.; Medina, C.
Volume Title:Environmental Geosciences
Source:Environmental Geosciences, 21(3), p.83-106. Publisher: American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Division of Environmental Geosciences, Tulsa, OK, United States. ISSN: 1075-9565
Publication Date:2014
Note:In English. 50 refs.; illus., incl. sketch map
Subjects:Aquifers; Cambrian; Cap rocks; Capillary pressure; Carbon dioxide; Carbon sequestration; Carbonate rocks; Clastic rocks; Computer programs; Contaminant plumes; Data processing; Dolostone; Eau Claire Formation; Failures; Ground water; Injection; Limestone; Lithofacies; Models; Mount Simon Sandstone; Paleozoic; Pollution; Porosity; Reactive transport; Sandstone; Sedimentary rocks; Shale; Siltstone; Transport; Upper Cambrian; Indiana; United States; GAMLS
Coordinates:N374500 N414500 W0844500 W0881000
Record ID:2014104793
Copyright Information:GeoRef, Copyright 2020 American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld, Alexandria, VA, United States, Reference includes data supplied by American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 04855naaaa2200697zu 4500
001 2014104793
003 ViAlAGI
005 20200224183532.0
008 200125e201409 okua 0 0 eng d
034 0 |a a  |d W0881000  |e W0844500  |f N414500  |g N374500 
040 |a ViAlAGI  |c ViAlAGI 
072 7 |a 30  |2 georeft 
072 7 |a 22  |2 georeft 
100 1 |a Lahann, R.  |u Indiana Geological Survey, Bloomington, IN 
245 1 3 |a An evaluation of the seal capacity and CO<2` retention properties of the Eau Claire Formation (Cambrian) 
300 |a p. 83-106 
500 |a In English. 50 refs. 
500 |a Key title: Environmental Geosciences 
500 |a Source note: Environmental Geosciences, 21(3), p.83-106. Publisher: American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Division of Environmental Geosciences, Tulsa, OK, United States. ISSN: 1075-9565 
500 |a Publication type: journal article 
504 |b 50 refs. 
506 1 |a Restricted access 
510 3 |a GeoRef, Copyright 2020 American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld, Alexandria, VA, United States, Reference includes data supplied by American Association of Petroleum Geologists 
520 |a The Eau Claire Formation of the midwestern United States was evaluated for its potential use as a confining unit (seal) overlying a sandstone reservoir to securely store injected CO<2`. This evaluation included: (1) lithofacies composition and distribution, (2) capillary entry pressure analysis, and (3) fluid- and fracture-pressure analysis. The regional distribution of lithofacies in the Eau Claire was evaluated by examination of core and log data from selected wells across the study area. Log data were used to define electro-lithofacies, which are spatially variable and represent a mixture of shale, siltstone, sandstone, limestone, and dolomite. Because of the significant variation in lithofacies and the complex spatial distribution, the entire interval should be considered in evaluating the seal capacity of the unit at a given locality. Mercury-injection capillary pressure (MICP) data were obtained on 17 samples of Eau Claire lithofacies ranging from muddy shale to sand/silt to evaluate the potential for capillary entry of fluids into the pore system of the lithofacies of the unit. Interpretation of these data indicated capillary failure of the muddy shale lithofacies is unlikely. However, many of the MICP samples contain millimeter-scale silt/sand interbeds, which would probably allow CO<2` entry but, because these beds commonly have very limited lateral continuity, they are very unlikely to provide pathways for large-scale CO<2` leakage through the interval. Evaluation of structural settings, lithostatic and existing formation aquifer pressures in the Eau Claire, in conjunction with the height of CO<2` columns stored in the underlying Mount Simon Sandstone (Cambrian), suggest that fluid pressures induced by a static buoyant CO<2` plume are unlikely to induce fractures in the formation. However, elevation of the aquifer pressure during injection may be capable of creating fractures within the unit. 
650 7 |a Aquifers  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Cambrian  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Cap rocks  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Capillary pressure  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Carbon dioxide  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Carbon sequestration  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Carbonate rocks  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Clastic rocks  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Computer programs  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Contaminant plumes  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Data processing  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Dolostone  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Eau Claire Formation  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Failures  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Ground water  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Injection  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Limestone  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Lithofacies  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Models  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Mount Simon Sandstone  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Paleozoic  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Pollution  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Porosity  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Reactive transport  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Sandstone  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Sedimentary rocks  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Shale  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Siltstone  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Transport  |2 georeft 
650 7 |a Upper Cambrian  |2 georeft 
651 7 |a Indiana  |2 georeft 
651 7 |a United States  |2 georeft 
653 |a GAMLS 
700 1 |a Rupp, J. 
700 1 |a Medina, C. 
773 0 |t Environmental Geosciences  |d Tulsa, OK : American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Division of Environmental Geosciences, Sep. 2014  |x 1075-9565  |n Environmental Geosciences, 21(3), p.83-106. Publisher: American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Division of Environmental Geosciences, Tulsa, OK, United States. ISSN: 1075-9565  |g Vol. 21, no. 3  |h illus., incl. sketch map 
856 |u urn:doi: 10.1306/eg.05011414003